Reviewed by Tom from Digital Shortbread
Given that the goal here is to come up with a post about a Robert De Niro film, one that I haven’t seen before, my options were wide open. Shame on me, I know, for having such limited experience with the great DeNiro’s extensive catalog. However, it provided the perfect opportunity for me to give Frank Oz’s turn-of-the-21st-century caper/thriller, The Score a whirl. The film, also starring Edward Norton and Marlon Brando, was widely touted as a project to feature “three generations of legendary big screen performers.” I suppose this relatively bland affair needs some kind of distinction, and that seems to be about as good as any.
As it turns out, Oz’s film is a somewhat entertaining two-hours, though it may be difficult to shake the feeling afterwards that it could have been a more compelling watch, considering the star talent on display. With all of this said, The Score is not a bad movie. It’s simply not one that will rack up too many points for DeNiro’s already well-established career.
Well, let’s see. First things first. DeNiro is going to be a little tougher to treat as king here since his part, while obviously substantial and crucial to the film, is not the most electrifying he’s ever undertaken. In fact, he downplays his safe-cracking Nick Wells to the point where one might think this is what DeNiro does on a night off just for shits and giggles. Indeed, he is convincing in his role yet again but is he much fun to watch go through the motions here? The answer to that, unfortunately, is no.
I’m not going to lie, at first that phrase “going through the motions” was used as a literal statement — about his character going through some of the ridiculous things he has to do in this movie — but the more I think about it, that phrase also applies figuratively-speaking as well. DeNiro does feel like he’s going through the motions, acting almost on autopilot as this really calm, cool and collected guy who knows exactly what he wants and who has the means of obtaining it. Never work with anyone else and never rob a building in the city in which you live. Nick lives by those two personal rules of high-risk thievery; that is, until the day he is coerced into doing one last job with somebody, at the request of his 25-year-long business partner, Max (Brando). The somebody is a highly technically proficient thief named Jackie Teller (Norton), who in stark contrast to Nick, is quick to emotion. Together, they aim to steal a priceless historical artifact from an unbelievably well-protected safe which possesses locking technology that neither Nick nor Jackie have worked with before.
The story may be anchored by strong leads in DeNiro, Norton and Brando but it’s a shame it can’t do much other than tread through very predictable territory. Ironically, predictability is not really something you want when creating supposedly an original crime caper. It’s an easy route to go by though, sure. Too many times it feels like story developments are hacked right out of Mission: Impossible and The Thomas Crown Affair, with only a few scenes mixed up in between that feel inspired. However, one thing that is not missing from this film is tension — perhaps THE most fundamental ingredient when concocting this kind of story. It also suitably builds towards a mostly satisfying conclusion, as we see the heist actually getting pulled off (but do the baddies get away with it all??) and the consequences and stakes being raised every minute that passes.
The tension is created in a few sparse moments of concerns exchanged between out-the-door thief Nick and Max, who finds himself in a tough spot with respect to his higher-ups. The legendary actors in these scenes are entirely responsible for the script coming to life in these moments.
Realizing this is a page for DeNiro gushing, the fact still cannot be overlooked about just how good Edward Norton is, though. DeNiro looks bored in comparison to how much fun Norton seems to be having. His character has dual identities: one as Jackie, the thief who works alongside Nick Wells, and the other is a mentally-handicapped custodian by the name of Brian, a personality Jackie adopts in order to gain valuable insight into the facility the two plan to rob. Norton is simply brilliant as he juggles the two sides to this complex character. It’s safe to say that without this fascinating and at times even humorous side story, The Score would undoubtedly be lower. It’s also a great deal of fun realizing the entire time that only certain truths are made available to each player in the game, and that’s as much as I can say without revealing major spoilers. Consider my lips sealed. . . now.
Recommendation: This film from the early 2000s has eluded me for over a decade, and now I can understand why. I’m quite confident that many of the diehards out there have already admitted that this wouldn’t necessarily be the first thing you would turn to when thinking of classic Robert DeNiro. It’s certainly not vintage, but it’s also not terrible either. It’s stationed in purgatory — destined forever to simply be an “alright Robert DeNiro film.” The slow pace that kicks this movie off does not make it an easy one to commit to, but it’s somewhat worthy of your time once we can get into the specifics of the plan, and better yet, the execution thereof. However, don’t feel like you’re missing out on anything if you haven’t checked this out yet.
Thanks again Tom, great work my friend. Norton was fantastic in this, always been a big fan of his. I love all the drama of Brando refusing to be directed by anyone except De Niro, and he often wore no pants……typical mental genius Brando 🙂
Hey man no problem, had a great time getting to know this film. . . and even though you HECKLED THE HELL OUT OF MY RATINGS. . . .. . . Im willing to do another one for you. Maybe.
Yeah, Norton was totally a major plus. I guess I could have discussed him more but figured I shouldn’t bc this is, ya know. . . Robbie’s page n all. lol thanks again! Cheers.
Haha, I have to be sure people fully back their rating. Especially when I think it’s too low lol 😉
You think a 7 is too low for The Score? I’d say that’s about fair. It’s definitely no higher.
No, but it started around a 3/10 until I bullied him into a few reconsiderations 😉
Lol. I’m not so sure about all this bullying now. I demand an honest opinion around here. If the man says 3, the man says 3. Then we throw it to the wolves and let them decide 😉
Haha, it wasn’t quite that bad. I just said are you sure, and Tom decided a 6 was too harsh, 7 was fair. I didnt do any forcing 🙂
Hmmm. Okay then! I’ll let this one slide 😉
LAwlZ. .
Great review that I couldn’t agree more with Tom. It was lethargic in places but still not a poor movie. It does feel like a missed opportunity, though. It’s could have been tighter and made more use of the DeNiro/Brando match-up. From right under their noses, Norton steals the show.
For sure! Thanks Sir Mark. I kinda might have been a bit cold but the entire half that was pre-heist felt slow-moving. Legendary characters on-screen no doubt. And I really did enjoy myself seeing the events take place in the latter half. But, yeah. Imagine it just a bit better, could’ve been a true classik.
Great write up here Tom. Sounds like some decent performances go some way to making up for a pretty generic film.
Nailed it on the head man. I enjoyed myself, can’t lie. But I won’t return to it. (Mainly because there’s so many damn other RDN flicks i need to get to first, and this page is gonna be a HUGE help!) lol. thanks again
Excellent review. Even though the movie may not have been that enjoyable, at least it provided all of us with this gem of a review. Great job! 🙂
Thanks so much Smash!!!!! Good movie, not great but there’s some stuff in there worth checking out if you’ve already cycled through a lot of his other stuff haha! This (shamefully) was my introduction to a Brando performance, too. Ha!
I have never actually heard of this film, sounds promising, with a great combo of actors. Solid review.
You’ve never heard of this? Surely not? DeNiro and Brando together?
Yeah Mark, it’s weird how could something like this avoid my attention? Regardless of the film’s quality, the trio of actors makes it stand.
out*
Cheers man, I did enjoy it quite a bit. You should definitely get around to seeing it, . . . .just not in a hurry.
I remember all the buzz about this when it came out. De Niro, Norton *and* Brando together on screen? At last?? Yes… but it could and should have been so much better. Great review Tom.
thanks dude, yeah even as I wasn’t in so much anticipation of it, I sensed that there was notable stench of missed opportunity throughout. Dialogue was pretty snappy here and there, but in all honesty, the most memorable thing about it was Ed Norton lol. incredible act.
This one has passed me by … sounds like it was directed by a right muppet.
*I’ll get my coat*
lol you should probably let it sail on by man, not too much to miss when considering the better DeNiro fare. 🙂
Nice review. Haven’t seen this one, but the combination of De Niro and Brando is impossible to resist. Both my two favorite actors.
Appreciate it, Ck! I wouldn’t prioritize it too highly, but there’s some good moments that you might could expect between the likes of Brando, DeNiro and Norton. Some interesting developments but overall a pretty forgettable flick considering all those names I just mentioned. haha
Oh, I really wanted to review this film! I loved it–Ed Norton was exceptional and even the rotund Brando was fine. I loved DeNiro’s performance. Great review!
Thank you Cindy!
I quite like this film. For some reason I used to have a copy on VHS that I also used to watch. Not vintage De Niro by any stretch, but decent.
Agreed. And by that marker, ‘decent DeNiro’ is worlds better than a great many current actors’ entire repertoire, good or bad. haha.
Never seen it – but I like the write up : )
thanks Isaac. Me bein’ all crazy again and cynical. But whatever. This page DOES have a black, dark, ominous background. I can be a bit dark if i want. lol thanks for the kind words
Black and yellow. Taxi Driver inspired baby!! 🙂
Pretty good movie, but what I remember most about it is how enormous Brando looked.
hahah Marlon Bloated Brando? oh, the inhumanity. . . .
Great review! 🙂 Never seen this because, quite frankly, it looks boring! And I really won’t bother now based on your review. I hate movies that are mediocre and try to pretend they’re worth watching just because there are big stars in it and this seems like one of those films.
No way, this is well worth watching!! Although knowing your thoughts on Raging Bull, it seems you must prefer shitty movies so best avoid the quality we promote here 😉
Lol! You know I took it pretty easy on Raging Bull. 😉
I might edit it and give it a 10. We shall see. You’re my next review up, Tuesday 😉
Excellent! 🙂 Like, today Tuesday?
hahah perhaps I was a tad harsh in this piece, but it felt a little too slow-going at times for a picture starring DeNiro, Brando and Norton. But when the action came, it definitely counted. And the awkward part is, brecause this is a page dedicated to DeNiro, I couldn’t spout off about how great Ed Norton is in this. He steals the film, in my opinion
Well, maybe I’ll give it a shot someday if I have nothing better to do. 😉 I do like Ed Norton. When he’s at his best, he’s great.
I really liked this one too, it was a pleasant surprise for me and have to agree that Norton was the star of The Score. Nicely done as always, Tom!
Thanks so much V! Yeah, Norton was amazing. DeNiro was good too, but nothing as memorable as his other performances, in virtually everything else he’s done (I’m pretty sure).